Legal Opinion

State v. Hasbrouck

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 6, 2002No. 219911673; A111619Published

1Per curiam

Defendant and the state have jointly moved for an order reversing the judgment convicting defendant of disorderly conduct and remanding the case for a new trial. We grant the motion.

Defendant waived his right to be represented by counsel during the course of trial. A jury found defendant guilty of the charged offense and a judgment of conviction was entered on August 11, 2000. The state concedes that the trial court accepted defendant’s waiver of his right to counsel and allowed defendant to represent himself for part of the trial without properly advising him of the risks of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. MeyrickOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. GrossCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API