Mekuria v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KESSLER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, owners and operators of neighborhood businesses in the Petworth area of the District of Columbia, are asserting a claim of inverse condemnation against Defendant Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (“WMATA”). They claim that Defendant, in the course of constructing the Georgia Avenue/Pet-worth Metrorail Station, has taken their property without just compensation in violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. This matter now comes before the Court for final decision after a five day bench…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Yuba Natural Resources, Inc. v. The United States, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. One Parcel Of Land In Montgomery County, MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.