Legal Opinion

Amalgamated Sugar Co. v. Industrial Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1920No. 3457PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Original proceedings by the Amalgamated Sugar Company, employer, and the Continental Casualty Company, insurer, to review an award of the Industrial Commission of Utah awarding compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act in favor of Ánnie C. Benson.

1Opinion of the CourtCoefman, C. J.

This matter was. brought on for review before this court under the provisions of Comp. Laws Utah 1917, section 3148, as amended by chapter 63, Laws Utah 1919 (section 3148a, page 164), upon the application of plaintiffs for a writ of *81certiorari wherein it was alleged that the Industrial Commission of Utah had exceeded its jurisdiction by rendering a decision and in making an award to Annie C. Benson for the use and benefit of herself and her minor children. Such writ was issued by this court February 25, 1920. In compliance with the writ the Industrial Commission (hereinafter referred to as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Industrial Commission v. EvansUtah Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Murray City v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Barron v. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'nTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  2. Tintic Milling Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Columbia Steel Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Casualty Underwriters v. FloresCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  5. Young v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1939

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API