Legal Opinion

Giles v. St. Charles Health System, Inc.

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided May 9, 2013No. 6:13-cv-00019-AAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

AIKEN, Chief Judge:

Plaintiff Carol Giles moves to limit defendant St. Charles Health System, Inc.’s communications with putative class members pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(d). Plaintiffs motion is granted in part and denied in part.

Plaintiff is employed as a registered nurse at one of defendant’s hospitals. Defendant obliges its hourly nurses (“caregivers”), such as plaintiff, to fulfill certain training and certification requirements, which are not necessary to maintain an Oregon nursing license, as a condition of employment. In November 2010, plaintiff informed hospital management that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Co. v. BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Jackie Kleiner v. The First National Bank of Atlanta, Hansell & Post, Richard Kirby and Richard M. Langway, George W. Morosani v. The First National Bank of Atlanta, Hansell & Post, Richard Kirby and Richard M. LangwayCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
  3. Longcrier v. HL-A CO., INC.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2009
  4. Arthuro Q. Bermudez v. Edward T. Duenas, Chief Parole Officer, Guam Parole Services DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. Belt v. Emcare, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Barriga v. 99 Cents Only Stores LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
  2. Barriga v. 99 Cents Only Stores LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API