Legal Opinion

Ex parte Bell

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 10, 1917No. 16168PublishedCited by 1 opinion

■ In the matter of Loletta Bell, minor.' Petition by Mrs. Sadie E: Bell for a writ of habeas corpus. On demurrer to the writ.

1Opinion of the Court

DOORING, District Judge.

Sadie E. Bell has petitioned this court for a writ of habeas corpus on behalf of Loletta Bell, a child of about six years of age. The petition shows that the petitioner and her husband duly and regularly adopted the child in Nevada in July, 1911, in accordance with the laws of that state and with the consent of the mother; that the child was then but 18 days old; that petitioner and her husband had the care and custody of the child by virtue of the adoption proceedings until December 18, 1915, when the mother kidnapped her, and removed her from that state; that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re BurrusSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Hoadly v. ChaseU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1904

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Carqueville v. WoodruffCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API