Legal Opinion

Iandolo v. Hearst Corp.

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided October 31, 1972No. 7874; No. 12518Published

1Opinion of the CourtMason, J.

The plaintiff claims to be aggrieved by the sustaining of a demurrer without leave to amend. There is no allegation of a grievance relative to the denial of leavé to amend.

The demurrer in the instant action was interposed for the cause that the declaration does *45not state facts constituting a cause of action. Cr.L. c. 231, § 18.

The sole question is the sufficiency of the declaration.

The declaration avers certain facts relative to the plaintiff and the defendant, and then alleges that “the defendant on or about June 12, 1971 while this contest was being offered, entered said contest; the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hacker v. BeckMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  2. Thompson v. SpagnuoloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API