Legal Opinion

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance

District Court, D. Wyoming

Decided December 21, 1964No. Civ. No. 4740PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KERR, Judge.

This action is between two insurance companies which wrote automobile liability insurance policies covering the same automobile. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, hereinafter referred to as Aetna, seeks a declaratory judgment to determine the respective rights and liabilities of the parties. It claims that St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, referred to herein as St. Paul, is obligated to contribute its proportionate share of the loss incurred on account of the insured. The requisite diversity of citizenship and jurisdictional amount are present.

The material facts are not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Oregon Auto. Ins. Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
  2. Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkWyoming Supreme Court · 1962
  3. United Services Automobile Ass'n v. HoweDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1962

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, a Corporation v. The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
  2. Universal C. I. T. Corp. v. Foundation Reserve InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. LTV Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  4. St. Paul Mercury Insurance v. Pennsylvania Casualty Co.District Court, D. Wyoming · 1986
  5. Hartford Accident And Indemnity Company v. The Ltv CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API