Legal Opinion

Hollander v. Nichols

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 20, 2009No. 1061094PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Justice.

Louis Frank Hollander, Jr., appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of Raymond Lee Nichols, Jr., the North Alabama Bone and Joint Clinic, P.C. (“the Clinic”), and Shoals Orthopedics, P.C. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

Facts and Procedural History

Many of the facts relevant to this appeal are included in this Court’s decision in Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated v. Hollander, 885 So.2d 125 (Ala.2003) (“Hollander I”), which involved a separate action Hollander brought against Coca-Coca Bottling Co. Consolidated (“CCBCC”). Those facts are as follows:

“Holl…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. William Edwards v. Aetna Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  3. Greene v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. Horne v. PattonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  5. Age-Herald Pub. Co. v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Campbell v. Bank of America, N.A.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012
  2. Ware v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co., 1100822 (Ala. 6-17-2011)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2011
  3. July v. Terminix Int'l Co.United States Circuit Court · 2019
  4. Terminix International Co. v. ScottSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013
  5. Garmon v. American Bar Association JournalDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2025

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API