Ricardo Sanchez v. American Airlines and Sedgwick CMS
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
In this workers’ compensation case, Claimant argues that the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) erred in finding that his April 2014 petition for' benefits (PFB) was barred by the statute of limitations in section 440.19, Florida Statutes (2011). Finding no error in the JCC’s application of the law to the facts, we affirm.
Subsection (1) of section 440. 19 provides generally that a PFB must be filed within two years after the date of injury or it will be barred, and subsection (2) provides that the only events that will extend the statute of limitations are the payment of indemnity benefits or…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McBride v. Pratt & WhitneyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Kinsey v. Skyline Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Longley v. Miami-Dade County School BoardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- Houston-Miller v. U.S. Fire InsuranceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Rene Stone Work Corp. v. GonzalezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
3Cited by5 opinions
- Loziane O. Moise v. Disney Pop Century Resort, and Walt Disney World etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- American Airlines Group American Airlines and Sedgwick CMS v. Alejandro LopezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024
- Daniel Murphy v. Polk County Board of County Commissioners, and Commercial Risk ManagementDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025
- Law Offices of William F. Souza v. Truly Nolen, Inc.,/ Crawford etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Ortiz v. Winn-Dixie, Inc., Travelers Insurance, and Sedgwick CMSDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024