Legal Opinion

Tyre v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 13, 1926No. 17404PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

The only special ground of the motion for a new trial is based upon the alleged relationship, within the prohibited degrees, of the prosecutor and one of the jurors who tried the case. This ground alleges that neither the accused nor his attorney knew of said relationship prior to the trial of the case, nor could either “have discovered the same sooner by the exercise of reasonable diligence.” In Wheeler v. Salinger, 33 Ga. App. 300 (9) (125 S. E. 888), this court held: “A bare recital in the affidavit of the movant or his counsel that the newly discovered evidence offered 'could not have…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ivey v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  2. Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  3. Patterson v. CollierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  4. Wheeler v. SalingerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  5. Frazier v. SwainSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Trammell v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  2. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  3. Robertson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  4. Kennedy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  5. Hart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API