Legal Opinion
United States v. Bestline Products Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 2, 1976No. C-73-0944-CBRPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION
RENFREW, District Judge.
The United States of America brought this action pursuant to the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 45 and 49, to recover civil penalties for alleged violations of a Federal Trade Commission Consent Order to Cease and Desist (“Consent Order”). On September 30, 1974, the Court approved a Final Consent Judgment and Order respecting the corporate defendants. The remaining defendant is William E. Bailey. Both parties have moved for partial summary judgment; these motions were argued extensively at hearings held on September 4, 1975, and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. ITT Continental Baking Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Education SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Hartford-Empire Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Piambino v. BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Piambino v. BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Reader's Digest Association, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Piambino v. BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- United States v. ACB Sales & Service, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.