Legal Opinion
In Re Corgiat
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California
Decided January 25, 1991No. 19-10331PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
DAVID E. RUSSELL, Bankruptcy Judge.
This is a no asset Chapter 7 ease with a claims bar date. Most Chapter 7 cases are no asset cases with a no dividend statement. The Debtors in this case seek to reopen their case to list an omitted creditor long after the claims bar date has elapsed. The problem presented is one of determining the effect of the claims bar date on the dischargeability of the creditor’s omitted claim.
i] The No Dividend Statement.
Under Bankruptcy Rule (“B.R.”) 2002(e), the bankruptcy clerk may, if it appears from the debtor’s schedules that the case is a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re Moses Hill, Debtor. Phelix Jones, Creditors v. Moses Hill, DebtorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- DeLesk v. Rhodes (In Re Rhodes)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Hughes Alonzo Robinson v. Tommy C. Mann, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- Lubeck v. Littlefield's Restaurant Corp. (In Re Fauchier)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Laczko v. Gentran, Inc. (In Re Laczko)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 75,314 in Re Fred Kennerley, Debtor. Larry Allred v. Fred Kennerley, AKA Frederick L. Kennerley, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Costa v. Welch (In Re Costa)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 1994
- In Re DodgeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 1992
- Kipp Flores Architects, LLC v. Mid-Continent Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- Hauge v. Skaar (In Re Hauge)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.