Legal Opinion

Rappeport v. Flitcroft

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 30, 1966PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

90 N.J. Super. 578 (1966)

218 A.2d 873

EMANUAL RAPPEPORT, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

WILLARD E. FLITCROFT AND SUBURBAN DISCOUNT GARDEN CENTERS, INC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued March 21, 1966.

Decided March 30, 1966.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FOLEY and COLLESTER.

Mr. Howard R. Weil argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Stone & Weil, attorneys; Mr. Leonard Stone, on the brief).

Mr. Robert D. Curran argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Vaccaro & Osborne, attorneys; Mr. George A. Vaccaro, on the brief).

GOLDMANN, S.J.A.D.

Plaintiff's two-count…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Feil v. SenisiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Tevis v. TevisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. Williams v. Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  3. Fees v. TrowSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  4. Pride v. PetersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  5. Montag v. Bergen Bluestone CompanyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API