Legal Opinion

Jackson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 12, 2017No. ED 105128PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., Presiding Judge

Introduction

Michael Ray Jackson (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.151 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

Background

After a trial, a jury convicted Movant of two counts of statutory sodomy in the first degree. The trial court sentenced Movant to concurrent terms of fifteen years in the Missouri Department of Corrections on one count and ten years on the other. This Court affirmed the convictions and sentences on appeal in State v. Jackson, 439 S.W.3d 276 (Mo. App. E.D. 2014).

Movant…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Lafler v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. Missouri v. FryeSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. Zink v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  5. Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nunley v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Brown v. FalkenrathDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2022
  3. CEBRON CORDELL FINLEY, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. Cannon v. PayneDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2023
  5. Daniels v. LewisDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API