Legal Opinion
Fiedelman v. New York State Department of Health
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 10, 1983PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
The provisions of CPLR 2103 (subd [c]) prescribing extensions of time where service on a party is made by mail do not apply to administrative proceedings.
The order of the Commissioner of Health imposing fines and suspending petitioner’s right to issue prescriptions was mailed to petitioner and his attorney by certified mail on April 3, 1981 in conformity with the provisions of subdivision 7 of section 3393 of the Public Health Law. Subdivision 1 of section 3394 of that law provides for judicial review under CPLR article 78, and subdivision 2 prescribes that application for…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Hans v. BurnsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- In re Art Metal Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- Claim of Luoma v. Spearin, Preston & Burrows, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- Claim of Luoma v. Spearin, Preston & Burrows, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Weingarten v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by28 opinions
- Chessin v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- IESI NY Corp. v. MartinezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Taylor v. Vassar CollegeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Cortlandt Nursing Home v. AxelrodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Lester v. New York State Office of ParksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.