Legal Opinion

Henry v. Polar Rock Development Corp.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 6, 1977No. 54220, 54221PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Shulman, Judge.

Appellants executed a note, unconditional on its face, for $25,000 plus interest payable to appellee, Polar Rock Development Corp. When appellants failed to pay the note at maturity suit was brought. Although a motion for summary judgment was granted in favor of Polar Rock Corp., that motion was set aside. In a subsequent trial before the judge without a jury, judgment again was entered in favor of Polar Rock. This appeal follows.

1. In a cross appeal, appellee (cross appellant) alleges that the judge erred in granting the motion to set aside. Appellee filed a motion for summary…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Henry v. ADAIR REALTY COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  2. Orkin Exterminating Co. v. TownsendCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  3. Crowder v. Electro-Kinetics Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1972
  4. Nevels v. Detroiter Mobile Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  5. Smith v. RaganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. C & S NATIONAL BANK v. BurdenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  2. Sullivan v. FabeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  3. Dutton v. DykesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  4. Val Preda Motors v. NATIONAL UNIFORM SERVICECourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  5. Daniels v. McRaeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API