Legal Opinion
Brookewood Investment Co. v. Sixty-Three Twenty-Four Chef Menteur Highway L.L.C.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided January 16, 2013No. 2012-CA-1205PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAX N. TOBIAS, JR., Judge.
| ¡.The plaintiff, Brookewood Investments Co., L.L.C. (“Brookewood”), appeals the trial court’s judgment that failed to adjudicate a tax sale as an absolute nullity, in addition to its determination that Brooke-wood’s only source of reimbursement is from the defendant, Sixty-Three Twenty-Four Chef Menteur Highway, L.L.C. (“Sixty-Three”) and Jacob Morreale (“Morreale”) and not the City of New Orleans (“the City”). For the following reasons, we amend the trial court’s judgment and affirm the judgment as amended.
In 2006, Brookewood filed a motion for writ of seizure and…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Leake v. ParsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
- Borden-Aicklen Auto Supply Co. v. Folse Service StationLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
- Cole v. MurrayLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
- Louisiana Municipal Association v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
- Lewis v. Succession of JohnsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2006
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Surcouf v. DarlingLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- Mooring Tax Asset Group, L.L.C. v. Roderick A. James and the United States Department of Treasury-Internal Revenue ServiceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2014
- Brookewood Investments Co. v. Sixty-Three Twenty-Four Chef Menteur Highway L.L.C.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
- Mooring Tax Asset Group, L.L.C. v. JamesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013