Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Caywood

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1996No. 95-2556PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

We concur in the board’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. However, respondent’s repeated violations of the Disciplinary Rules over a relatively short period of time merit a more severe penalty than that recommended by the board. Respondent’s most recent violations took place approximately one month after his suspension was announced by this court in Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Caywood, 71 Ohio St.3d 164, 642 N.E.2d 625. In defiance of our ordered suspension, respondent continued to practice law by appearing in court as an attorney, even though he knew that it was clearly improper for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. CaywoodOhio Supreme Court · 1994

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association v. PryatelOhio Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. RothermelOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. HendersonOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. CaywoodOhio Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API