Legal Opinion

Kimble v. Solomon

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided June 5, 1979No. 77-2316PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WINTER, Circuit Judge:

In this appeal, it is not disputed that the State of Maryland instituted an across-the-board reduction in Medicaid benefits without complying with federal regulations requiring individual notice to affected recipients. The only question is what relief may be given by the district court. The district court ordered the state to comply with federal notice regulations when instituting any future reductions, but reluctantly it held that the eleventh amendment barred any further relief. We think that the eleventh amendment permits an order requiring the prospective restoration…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Hans v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Wicomico Nursing Home v. Lourdes PadillaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
  2. K.W. Ex Rel. D.W. v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  3. Stenson v. BlumDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979
  4. Geraldine Buckhanon and Rosetta Bailey, and Cross-Appellants v. Donald Percy, Bernard J. Stumbras and Kenneth Rentmeester, and Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  5. Aluminum Company of America, a Pennsylvania Corporation, and Tapoco, Inc., a Tennessee Corporation v. Utilities Commission of the State of North Carolina Robert K. Koger, Leigh M. Hammond, Sarah Lindsay Tate, John W. Winter, Edward B. Hipp, A. Hartwell Campbell, and Douglas O. Leary, in Their Respective Official Capacities as Chairman and Commissioners of the North Carolina Utilities Commission, Rufus L. Edmisten, Attorney General of North Carolina, Amicus Curiae, United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio, and Local Union 309, Amicus Curiae. State of Tennessee, Tennessee Office of Economic and Community Development, and Aluminum Company of America, a Pennsylvania Corporation, and Tapoco, Inc., a Tennessee Corporation v. Utilities Commission of State of North Carolina, Robert L. Koger, Leigh M. Hammond, Sarah Lindsay Tate, John W. Winter, Edward B. Hipp, A. Hartwell Campbell and Douglas O. Leary, in Their Respective Official Capacities as Chairman and Commissioners of the North Carolina Utilities Commission, Rufus L. Edmisten, Attorney General of North Carolina, Amicus Curiae, United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio, and Local Union 309, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API