Legal Opinion
Harris v. Sebelius
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 26, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2011-0483PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge.
United States Magistrate Judge Deborah A. Robinson denied without prejudice defendant’s original motion to dismiss plaintiffs 228-page complaint and directed plaintiff, proceeding pro se, to file an amended complaint “no more than 20 pages long” that complies with the pleading requirements of Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Mem. Order (Feb. 6, 2012). Plaintiff filed an amended complaint [Dkt. # 21] and defendant has renewed her motion to dismiss pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii) and Rules 8(a), 10(a), 12(b)(1)…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Victor Herbert v. National Academy of SciencesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Wash. v. TrumpCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Bank of America, National Association v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Canuto v. PelosiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. TrumpDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Harvey v. ColvinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.