Legal Opinion

Cetinkaya v. Gonzales

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 15, 2007No. 04-71254Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Petitioner Coskun Cetinkaya, a Turkish national, appeals from two final Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) orders: (1) an August 30, 2002 order affirming the immigration judge’s denial of Cetinkaya’s application for asylum and withholding of removal, and (2) a February 18, 2004 order denying Cetinkaya’s motion to reopen the BIA’s August 30, 2002 order.1 We deny Cetinkaya’s petition in its entirety.

I. August 30, 2002 Order of Removal

The time limit of 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)— that a petition for review must be filed within 30 days after the final order of removal — is mandatory and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Selamawit Zehatye v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  2. Ram Singh, AKA Singh Ram Sukhdev Ram v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. Singh v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Liliana Vassileva Konstantinova Petre Konstantinov Petrov v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. Maria Angelica Membreno v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API