Legal Opinion

Paul Tishman Co. v. Carney & Del Guidice, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 20, 1971PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Per curiam

The action, though not so in name, is in subrogation by insurers who have paid a loss. The loss was occasioned by a fire in a building under construction. Recovery over is sought against a subcontractor on grounds of negligence and an agreement to indemnify. The defendant moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that it was itself an insured under the contracts of insurance. The motion was granted in the Civil Court but the order was reversed in the Appellate Term. The matter is before us by permission granted by this court.

We agree with the determination made by the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Berry v. American Central Insurance Co. of St. LouisNew York Court of Appeals · 1892

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Federal Insurance v. Arthur Andersen & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. McBroome-Bennett Plumbing, Inc. v. Villa France, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  3. South Tippecanoe School Building Corp. v. Shambaugh & Son, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Frank Briscoe Company, Inc. v. Georgia Sprinkler Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  5. S.S.D.W. Co. v. Brisk Waterproofing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1990

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API