Legal Opinion

Williams v. Tyson's Food, Inc.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided June 12, 2006PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.

[¶ 1] Tyson’s Food, Inc. appeals from a decision of a hearing officer of the Workers’ Compensation Board (Jerome, HO) determining that Diana Williams was entitled to workers’ compensation benefits after she had been fired from a post-injury job for excessive late arrivals at work. Tyson’s contends that 39-A M.R.S. § 214(1)(E) (2005) prohibits an award of benefits when an employee loses post-injury employment due to fault, and -that the *196hearing officer erred in construing the term “fault” too narrowly. We affirm.

I. CASE HISTORY

[¶ 2] Williams injured her knee on June 19, 2002, when she slipped…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jordan v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  2. Sington v. Chrysler CorporationMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Bureau v. Staffing Network, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  4. Bernard v. Mead Publishing Paper DivisionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  5. Cousins v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Adoption of M.A.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API