Legal Opinion

Michael Francis Fay Jones, a Minor, by His Father and Next Friend, Arthur Edgar Jones, Jr., and Arthur Edgar Jones, Jr. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided January 10, 1957No. 7246_1PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, District Judge.

On this appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, appellants urge that the lower court has improperly interpreted the principles of law applicable to the facts of the case. The action is under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b), and the able opinion of the learned District Judge is reported below under the style of Jones v. City of Aberdeen, Maryland, D.C., 138 F.Supp. 727.

During the year 1943 the Federal Public Housing Administration saw fit to erect a housing project, known as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State of Maryland v. Manor Real Estate & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
  2. Smith v. State Ex Rel. WalshCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1901
  3. McCarthy v. New York, N. H. & H. R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
  4. Jones v. City of Aberdeen, MarylandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1956

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Limberhand v. Big Ditch Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1985
  2. McKinney v. Hartz & Restle Realtors, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Cousins v. YaegerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. MacKe Laundry Service Co. v. WeberCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  5. Levine v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API