Legal Opinion

National Surety Co. v. Atascosa Ice, Water & Light Co.

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided June 24, 1925No. 423-3519PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPowell, P. J.

In stating the nature of this case, we quote as follows from the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals, written by Justice Cobbs:

“This suit was filed in the district court of Atascosa county, Tex., by the Atascosa Ice, Water & Light Company, originally against only the Atascosa County State Bank, plaintiff, seeking to recover from said bank judgment for $7,182 allfeged to have been deposited by it with said bank, and payment of which amount had been refused by said bank. The bank filed its answer, making the National Surety Company a party, and seeking judgment over against it for any amount…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Holland v. NimitzTexas Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Skipwith v. HurtTexas Supreme Court · 1901
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. FossatiTexas Supreme Court · 1904
  4. National Surety Co. v. Atascosa Ice, Water & Light Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  5. J. M. West & R. C. Duff v. CarlisleTexas Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Reagan County Purchasing Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  2. Labor Bank & Trust Co. v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  3. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Ry. Co. v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
  4. City of Waco, Tex. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935
  5. Rips v. UngermanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API