Legal Opinion
American Zurich Insurance v. Montana Thirteenth Judicial District Court
Montana Supreme Court
Decided March 13, 2012No. 11-0526PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*300OPINION AND ORDER
¶1 American Zurich Insurance Company (Zurich) seeks a writ of supervisory control, arguing that the Thirteenth Judicial District Court is proceeding based on a mistake of law in controlling discovery with respect to matters protected by the attorney-client privilege and the work product doctrine. We accept review of the petition in this instance because the case presents a purely legal issue for which, if the District Court erred, there would be no adequate remedy on appeal. For the reasons that follow, we conclude the District Court correctly applied the law of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. WeintraubSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Deloitte LLPCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- G. BouSamra, M.D. v. Excela Health, Aplts.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Draggin' Y Cattle Co. v. AddinkMontana Supreme Court · 2013
- In re Fox v. AlfiniSupreme Court of Colorado · 2018
- Nelson v. City of Billings and MMIAMontana Supreme Court · 2018
- Kittitas Cnty., Corp. v. Sky Allphin, Abc Holdings, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2017
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.