Barsi v. Simpson
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new- trial. John Hunt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The appeal is by plaintiff from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
The plaintiff suffered a fracture of the left arm between the wrist and elbow on the fifteenth day of March, 1913, and on the same day employed the defendant, a physician and surgeon, to set the fracture. Thereafter the defendant set the fracture, and it is claimed on behalf of the plaintiff that the defendant failed to use due care in this respect, by reason of which certain permanent injuries to the plaintiff resulted. The sole claim of negligence, as appears from, an examination of the complaint, is that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Vallejo & Northern R.R. v. Reed Orchard Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Kimic v. San Jose-Los Gatos Interurban Ry.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Robinson v. Exempt Fire Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Tarpey v. VeithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Lund v. Masonic Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by1 opinion
- Longuy v. La Societe Francaise De Bienfaisance MutuelleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921