Legal Opinion

Klingenschmidt v. Martocci

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided September 15, 1919Published

Motion to strike out separate defense in an answer.

1Opinion of the CourtValente, J.

This is a motion to strike out the separate defense in the answer on the ground that it is insufficient as matter of law. The action is brought under the Stock Corporation Law of New York, section 69, against the defendant, as treasurer of a domestic corporation, to recover the statutory penalty because of defendant’s failure to deliver to plaintiff a verified statement of the corporate assets and liabilities pursuant to a written demand duly served upon the defendant on October 31, 1918. The answer contains a general denial of the material allegations of the complaint, and also contains a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Henry v. . Babcock Wilcox Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1909
  2. People v. American Press Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  3. Townsend v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API