Legal Opinion

City of New Albany v. Cotner

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 30, 2009No. 22A01-0904-CV-175PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VAIDIK, Judge.

Case Summary

K. Lee Cotner, Richard R. Fox, Steve Gustafson, and the Law Offices of Fox & Cotner (collectively, "Fox & Cotner") represented the City of New Albany ("the City") in connection with its sewer fee dispute with the Town of Georgetown ("Georgetown") on a contingency fee basis. Georgetown ultimately paid the City pursuant to a settlement agreement, but the City refused to pay Fox & Cotner the contingent fee based on the entire amount of the settlement and instead sued Fox & Cotner for a determination of whether a valid fee contract existed, and if so, whether the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Williams v. TharpIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Bushong v. WilliamsonIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Sheraton Corp. of Am. v. Kingsford Packing Co., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Galanis v. Lyons & TruittIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Meisenhelder v. Zipp Express, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Town of New Chicago v. City of Lake Station Ex Rel. Lake Station Sanitary DistrictIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Vesuvius USA, Corporation v. American Commercial Lines, LLCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  3. Wise v. HaysIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Wright v. City of GaryIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. AMERICAN SAVINGS, FSB v. TokarskiIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API