Legal Opinion

Gregorio v. Getty Petroleum Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 3, 1994PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Anita Florio, J.), entered June 11, 1993, which denied defendants’ and third-party defendant-appellant’s motions for summary judgment, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of granting the motion to dismiss plaintiff’s Labor Law § 200 claim as against defendant Getty Petroleum Corporation, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

Since plaintiff’s decedent was working on a ladder at the time of the incident and was thus exposed to an "elevation-related hazard”, he comes within the protection of Labor Law § 240 (1) if his death was proximately caused…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ross v. Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Comes v. New York State Electric & Gas Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Gordon v. Eastern Railway Supply, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1993

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Baird v. Lydall, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. Buckley v. RadovichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. Tanzer v. A. Terzi ProductionsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API