Legal Opinion

In Re the Accounting of Keesey

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 19, 1928PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The dominant purpose of the testator to create a trust, divided into separate shares terminable by separate lives, is written large upon the face of the will. (Matter of Horner, 237 N. Y. 489.) Each beneficiary receives an interest in a share cut from the body of the estate.

The income of one-half of the estate is to be paid to the testator’s daughter during her life. The income of the other half is to be paid to two grandsons “ in equal parts share and share alike ” for a period of three years after the death of the testator. At the expiration of the three years, the testator has directed the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re the Will of HornerNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
  2. Schermerhorn v. . CottingNew York Court of Appeals · 1892

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re the Accounting of SchulzNew York Surrogate's Court · 1949
  2. In re the Construction of the Will of SiskNew York Surrogate's Court · 1950
  3. In re the Construction of the Will of TurnerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1929
  4. In re the Estate of KleinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1963
  5. In re the Estate of MorosanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API