Legal Opinion

Sound Reality Co. v. Nicholson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 29, 1941No. Appeal No. 1; Appeal No. 2; Appeal No. 3PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCallahan, J.

We find that the motions to vacate the three peremptory orders of mandamus were properly denied. Said motions rested in the main on the claim that by a certain contract of sale dated July 12, 1910, executed by petitioner as grantor, petitioner assigned to its grantees any rights it might have in any award for damages for the closing of the streets involved in these proceedings. We had occasion to construe the same contract in Matter of City of New York (Garden Place, etc.) (258 App. Div. 490), and there held that it did not effect such an assignment. An appeal from that determination was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of City of N.Y. (Vernon Parkway)New York Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. In re the Corporation CounselAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  3. In re the Application of City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mills v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
  2. In re Nassau County Relative to Acquiring Title to BrookAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API