Legal Opinion
McMahon v. Mayo
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided February 13, 1957PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DREW, Justice.
This case is before the court on an original petition for writ of habeas corpus and return by the custodian. Petitioner was convicted by a jury after a trial on an information charging him with breaking and entering with intent to commit a misdemeanor. The original sentence was pronounced by the court on October 28, 1954 in the following language:
“Now, Therefore You, Thomas McMahon, having pleaded Not Guilty and having been tried by Jury and having been adjudged Guilty of the crime of Breaking and Entering to Commit a a Misdemeanor, as charged in the Information filed herein,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. HorneSupreme Court of Florida · 1906
- Sneed v. MayoSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
- Tanner v. WigginsSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
- Ragland v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
- Brooke v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Sonner v. ShearinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Bateh v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
- McCloskey v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
- Tilghman v. CulverSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
- State Ex Rel. Johnson v. VizziniSupreme Court of Florida · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.