Southern Pacific Co. v. Fellows
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtYork, J.
The facts upon which appellant railroad company bases its claim to recover upon an indemnity agreement, and a surety bond executed pursuant thereto by respondent Fellows, as principal, and respondent corporation, as surety, are contained in a stipulation of facts set out in the bill of exceptions herein. It is there shown, among other things, that on December 6, 1923, appellant railroad company and respondent Fellows, as contractor, entered into a contract by which the latter undertook the construction of a locomotive erecting shop for the railroad company. In addition to a provision…
2Cited by18 opinions
- Griffiths v. Henry Broderick, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1947
- Vinnell Co. v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Morrison-Knudsen Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Worden-Allen Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
- Princemont Construction Corp. v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1957
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.