Legal Opinion

Burlington Northern R. Co. v. Warren

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 21, 1990No. 89-682Published

1Opinion of the Court

574 So.2d 758 (1990)

BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY

v.

Nettie Faye Duckworth WARREN, as administratrix of the estate of James B. Duckworth, deceased, et al.

89-682.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

December 21, 1990.

Rehearing Denied February 8, 1991.

L. Vastine Stabler, Jr., and Samuel C. Campisi of Cabaniss, Johnston, Gardner, Dumas & O'Neal, Birmingham, for appellant.

Frank O. Burge, Jr. of Burge & Wettermark, Birmingham, and Wilson & King, Jasper, for appellee.

HORNSBY, Chief Justice.

James Duckworth was employed by the St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company, predecessor to the defendant, Burlington…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Kennedy; Concurrence · Maddox.

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Second Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Bailey v. Central Vermont Railway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Dice v. Akron, Canton & Youngstown RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Central Vermont Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. CooganSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API