Legal Opinion

Furrh v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 11, 1894No. 698PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIGHTFOOT, Chief Justice.

This is a proceeding by the State, on the relation of J. D. Rudd and others, by information, in the nature of a quo warranta, against certain trustees of the village of Waskom, in Harrison County. The respondents and many other persons, inhabitants of the village of Waskom and the vicinity thereof, on the 1st day of July, 1892, presented to the county judge of Harrison County a petition under article 541a, Revised Civil Statutes of Texas, to incorporate for school purposes. The petition is as follows:

“We, the undersigned citizens of Waskom and vicinity, hereby…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ewing v. State Ex Rel. PollardTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. State ex rel. Goodnight v. GoowinTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Dillard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1893

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Universal City v. City of SelmaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  2. Bloxton v. McWorterWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Ex parte SteinCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
  4. Ex Parte SteinCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API