Siegel v. Goldstone
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal from City Court of New York, Special Term. Action by Harry A. Siegel against Alfred H. Goldstone. From an order denying a motion for interpleader, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtSeabury, J.
This is an appeal from an order denying a motion for interpleader. It appears that the defendant was indebted to the firm of Bodker & Tanzman, who were partners. Plaintiff sues for the amount of the debt under an assignment from Bodker. Tanzman gave written notice to the defendant not to pay the amount to Bodker or his assignee, and' demanded payment to him.
We are of the opinion that the motion for interpleader shpuld have been granted. The plaintiff claimed as the assignee of one partner, and the other partner also claimed to be entitled to the payment of the debt, which the plaintiff…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Tillie May Pouch v. Prudential InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
3Cited by1 opinion
- Barnett v. Max L. Typermass & Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1912