Legal Opinion

Mullen v. Cronan

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided July 21, 1919PublishedCited by 7 opinions

On bill, &c.

1Opinion of the Court

Lewis, V. C.

The real proposition presented by this issue is that this court should reform an assignment, absolute on its face, made by the complainant to John Mullins, his father-in-law, of his interest in two hundred aliares of Colonial Land Company stock. If the proofs, as presented, do not justify the court in doing this, the executor should not be restrained from pleading at law this assignment, and the bill tiled by him should be dismissed. A further review of the evidence in this case does not change the opinion entertained by me at the-conclusion of the oral proceedings that this…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Riggle v. SkillNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  2. Scult v. Bergen Valley Builders, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  3. Mutual Life Insurance v. MetzgerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934
  4. Millhurst Milling & Drying Co. v. Automobile Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  5. Rauh v. BickNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API