Legal Opinion

Mathis v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided September 25, 1936No. A-9073PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavenport, J.

The plaintiffs in error, hereafter referred to as the defendants, were charged by information with the crime of open and notorious adultery; the charging part of the information is as follows:

“That Rhodie Hill and Bill Mathis, did, in Latimer County, and in the State of Oklahoma, on or about the 1st day of June, in the year of our Lord One Thousand Nine Hundred and Thirty-five and anterior to the presentment hereof, commit the crime of Adultery in the manner and form as folloivs, to wit:
“That is to say: That on the day and date above mentioned and in said county and state, did unlawfully,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Kitchens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Copeland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Lee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Barber v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fernbaugh v. HurtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1960
  2. Hagan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API