Gonzalez v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Although we do not believe that chapter 95-184 violates the single-subject requirement found in Article III, section 6 of the Florida Constitution, see Trapp v. State, 736 So.2d 736 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999), we follow Trap and Heggs v. State, 718 So.2d 263 (Fla. 2d DCA), rev. granted, 720 So.2d 518 (Fla.1998) in certifying the issue to the Florida Supreme Court as a matter of great public importance. The judgment entered below is affirmed.
Affirmed.
JORGENSON and GERSTEN, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Heggs v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Trapp v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
3Cited by2 opinions
- Diaz v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Gonzalez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000