Legal Opinion

Baez v. Lemacks

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 5, 1994No. S94A1133PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fletcher, Justice.

Roberto Baez appeals from the denial of his habeas corpus petition. The trial court found that Baez is being legally detained pending trial under two valid warrants. We affirm.

Baez presents no claim that shows his pretrial detention is illegal. He is not entitled to discharge based on his allegations of an illegal stop and seizure or ineffective assistance of counsel at the preliminary hearing. See Kearse v. Paulk, 264 Ga. 509 (448 SE2d 369) (1994); York v. Jarvis, 248 Ga. 774 (286 SE2d 296) (1982). Nor is he entitled to relief based on the trial court’s refusal to allow him…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kearse v. PaulkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  2. Mayfield v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  3. York v. JarvisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  4. Baez v. LeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Smith v. NicholsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  2. Holmes v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  3. Baez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  4. Baez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API