Legal Opinion

Great Seneca Financial v. Felty

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 15, 2006No. C-050929PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gorman, Presiding Judge.

{¶ 1} Terry Felty appeals from the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of Great Seneca Financial (“GSF”) in the amount of $7,406.79 plus interest in an action on a credit-card account. In two assignments of error, Felty argues (1) that the trial court erred in entering summary judgment because genuine issues of material fact existed as to GSF’s claim and (2) that the trial court erred in awarding GSF interest on the account in an amount different from that demanded in its complaint. For the following reasons, we sustain Felty’s first assignment of error in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Village of Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Mitseff v. WheelerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. United States v. Randolph JakobetzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  5. United States v. Craig Lee ChildsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Arrowood Indemnity Co. v. FaschingOregon Supreme Court · 2022
  2. State v. ThyotOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Alloway v. RT Capital, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. AndersOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Chase Bank, USA v. CurrenOhio Court of Appeals · 2010

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API