Legal Opinion

Railroad Commission v. Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 23, 1909No. 182PublishedCited by 68 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. This case .comea here upon appeal by the railroad commission, which was defendant below, from a decree of the Circuit Court.of the United States for die Eastern District of Louisiana, enjoining the enforcement- of certain rates prescribed by the • railroad commission of that State, fór use by the appellee telephone company therein.

Read the full summary

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. This case .comea here upon appeal by the railroad commission, which was defendant below, from a decree of the Circuit Court.of the United States for die Eastern District of Louisiana, enjoining the enforcement- of certain rates prescribed by the • railroad commission of that State, fór use by the appellee telephone company therein. The appellant was created under art. 283 of the constitution of the State'of Louisiana; and art. 284 of that constitution authorizes it to adopt just and reasonable rates,…

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Justice Peckham,

after' making.The foregoing state-ment, delivered the opinion of the court.

The complainant herein is a citizen of the State of Kentucky, while the 'defendant is a citizen of the State of Louisiana, and á case of diverse' citizenship therefore appears on the record. The complainant is transacting its business in several States, in a territory which is said to be four hundred miles wide and one thousand miles long, beginning in Indiana and Illinois and extending through the States of Kentucky, Tennessee, Mississippi and Louisiana, to the Gulf of Mexico. Its capital, from the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Reagan v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Willcox v. Consolidated Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  4. City of Knoxville v. Knoxville Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  5. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1900

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. New York Ex Rel. New York & Queens Gas Co. v. McCallSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. City of Evansville v. Southern Indiana Gas & Electric Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Alabama-Tennessee Natural Gas Company v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API