Legal Opinion
Brinkley v. Houk
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided December 5, 2011No. Case No. 4:06CV0110PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER
JOHN R. ADAMS, District Judge.
Petitioner, Grady Brinkley (“Brinkley” or “Petitioner”), has filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (“Petition”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (ECF 15). He challenges his conviction and sentence for the aggravated murder of Shantae Smith that were imposed by the Lucas County, Ohio Common Pleas Court. Brinkley also asserts that the Ohio death penalty statutes, R.C. 2903.01 through 2929.05, are unconstitutional. Along with the Petition, the Court has reviewed the Respondent, Marc C. Houk’s (“Respondent”), Return of Writ (ECF 47),…
2Cases cited260 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
255 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jones v. BradshawDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2015
- Avery v. Warden, Marion Correctional InstitutionDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
- Jackson v. HoukDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2021
- Marques v. Warden, Noble Correctional InstitutionDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
- Martre v. TurnerDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.