Legal Opinion

Seneca Insurance v. Naprawa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 14, 2002PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Nicholas Figueroa, J.), entered September 10, 2001, which, in an action to determine whether the policy issued by plaintiff to defendant 985 Fifth Avenue Company requires plaintiff to indemnify its insureds in the event that the liability alleged against the insureds in the underlying action is established, denied, with leave to renew following a determination of liability in the underlying action, defendants-appellants’ motion for partial summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

In the underlying action, Jeffrey Naprawa alleges that a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Worcester Insurance v. BettenhauserNew York Court of Appeals · 2000

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hough v. USAA Casualty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance v. SteelyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API