Legal Opinion

McLeod v. Crosby

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1901PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Montcalm; Wolcott, J., presiding. Case by Dan McLeod against James S. Crosby for slander and malicious prosecution. From a j udgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The defendant has appealed from a verdict and judgment for $320 in an action for slander and malicious prosecution. The three counts for slander are substantially alike, and the following-quotation from the first will serve to make plain the rulings and points raised thereon:

“ * * * say of and concerning this plaintiff, in the presence and hearing of this plaintiff, Charles S. Fuller, and other divers good and worthy citizens of the State of Michigan, did speak, publish, and declare of and concerning said plaintiff the following false, malicious, and defamatory words, to wit: ‘McLeod stole…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Torrey v. FieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1838
  2. Fowler v. GilbertMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Shepard v. MerrillNew York Supreme Court · 1816
  4. Youngs v. AdamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  2. State v. MillerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Slater v. WalterMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  4. State v. PendletonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  5. Burkhiser v. LyonsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API