Hartman v. Sherwood Arkansas, City of
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION JAMIE HARTMAN PLAINTIFF v. Case No. 4:21-cv-00974 KGB CITY OF SHERWOOD, ARKANSAS DEFENDANT ORDER Before the Court is defendant City of Sherwood, Arkansas’s motion for protective order (Dkt. No. 6). Plaintiff Jamie Hartman has responded in opposition to the City of Sherwood’s request for protective order (Dkt. No. 8). The City of Sherwood has replied in support of its motion for protective order (Dkt. No. 10). For good cause shown, the Court grants the City of Sherwood’s motion for protective order (Dkt. No. 6).…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- John Doe Agency v. John Doe Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- City of Fayetteville v. EdmarkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Matco MacHine and Tool Company v. Cincinnati Milacron CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984