Legal Opinion

Goulden v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided June 4, 1974No. 3 Div. 261PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CATES, Presiding Judge.

First degree forgery: sentence, twenty years. Code 1940, T. 14, §§ 199 & 207.

*279i

There is no endorsement on the indictment of instant concern. All the record shows after “against the peace and dignity of the State of Alabama” is the signature of the Solicitor (sic) followed by a notation reading. “Filed in open Court ón the 16 February A.D. 1972” with the signature of the clerk thereto.

Code 1940, T. 30, § 89 requires the concurrence of at least twelve grand jurors to find an indictment. The bill thereof must be indorsed “a true bill” with the signature of the foreman. See…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Roan v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. Huddleston v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953
  3. Kennedy v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1958
  4. Whitley v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  5. McMullen v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1920

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hayes v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  2. Pendleton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API