Legal Opinion

Foster v. Bloom

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 15, 1859PublishedCited by 4 opinions

from the District Court of the Parish of East Feliciana, Ratliff, J.

1Opinion of the CourtBuchanan, J.

This case is before us upon oppositions to an account of administration. There are six distinct parties appellant.

1. Dr. Iluff complains that his opposition, founded upon a bill for medical attendance, has not been sustained to the full extent. An examination of the evidence has not satisfied us that the District Judged erred.

2. Charles Knapp ; 3. Bowman & GaiA These two oppositions are similar to each other in principle. Knapp furnished a sugar mill, saw mill and steam engine; and Bowman & Qair erected the buildings to contain the same. This work was done at the request of Albert G. Penny,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gasquet v. DimitrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1836
  2. Bell v. NorwoodSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1834
  3. Breaux v. CarmoucheSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1844
  4. Waggaman v. ZacharieSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1844

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Long v. WattsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  2. Long v. . WattsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  3. Dickinson Motors Co. v. SullivanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. Haas v. HayesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API