Legal Opinion

Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Nueces County

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1994No. D-4397PublishedCited by 116 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CORNYN, Justice,

dehvered the opinion of the Court, in which ah Justices join.

The Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act (FIRREA) provides in part:

No property of the [Federal Deposit Insurance] Corporation shah be subject to levy, attachment, garnishment, foreclosure, or sale without the consent of the Corporation, nor shah any involuntary hen attach to the property of the Corporation.

12 U.S.C. § 1825(b)(2) (1989). This case initially presented the issue of whether this statute bars foreclosure of a statutory property tax hen by local taxing authorities when the Federal…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Camarena v. Texas Employment CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  2. GENERAL LAND OFFICE OF THE STATE OF TEX. v. Oxy USA, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Matagorda County v. Russell LawCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  4. University Interscholastic League v. BuchananCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  5. Donna Independent School District v. BalliCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by116 opinions

  1. Labrado v. County of El Paso, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2004
  2. Bonilla v. Roberson, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1996
  3. Meeker v. Tarrant County College DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2010
  4. Lincoln Property Co. v. Kondos, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2003
  5. Securtec, Inc. v. County of Gregg, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003

111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API